This past week, there was an interesting issue related to an ongoing trial in a federal court. Certain people (with testimony by expert witness Richard Kahlenberg) accused Harvard University of favoring certain groups of students during the admissions process, such as those with a family member connected to the college and who are predominantly white and wealthy. The plaintiffs called for “race-neutral alternatives” that Harvard could use during the admissions process to ensure class diversity, but the college refused these, arguing they would not work. One of the plaintiffs’ main arguments was that Harvard was “squeezing out” many highly qualified Asian-Americans because they were giving preference to the students with connections. Kahlenberg also believed that the university should give a stronger preference to the low-income students, as Harvard had not done a good job of admitting skilled students who were in poverty. Under the plaintiffs’ proposal, they believed that the percent...